Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito 6f592e5aca job.c: enable job lock/unlock and remove Aiocontext locks
Change the job_{lock/unlock} and macros to use job_mutex.

Now that they are not nop anymore, remove the aiocontext
to avoid deadlocks.

Therefore:
- when possible, remove completely the aiocontext lock/unlock pair
- if it is used by some other function too, reduce the locking
  section as much as possible, leaving the job API outside.
- change AIO_WAIT_WHILE in AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED, since we
  are not using the aiocontext lock anymore

The only functions that still need the aiocontext lock are:
- the JobDriver callbacks, already documented in job.h
- job_cancel_sync() in replication.c is called with aio_context_lock
  taken, but now job is using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED so we need to
  release the lock.

Reduce the locking section to only cover the callback invocation
and document the functions that take the AioContext lock,
to avoid taking it twice.

Also remove real_job_{lock/unlock}, as they are replaced by the
public functions.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220926093214.506243-19-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2022-10-07 12:11:41 +02:00
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito 191e7af394 jobs: use job locks also in the unit tests
Add missing job synchronization in the unit tests, with
explicit locks.

We are deliberately using _locked functions wrapped by a guard
instead of a normal call because the normal call will be removed
in future, as the only usage is limited to the tests.

In other words, if a function like job_pause() is/will be only used
in tests to avoid:

WITH_JOB_LOCK_GUARD(){
    job_pause_locked();
}

then it is not worth keeping job_pause(), and just use the guard.

Note: at this stage, job_{lock/unlock} and job lock guard macros
are *nop*.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220926093214.506243-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2022-10-07 12:11:41 +02:00
Hanna Reitz 4cfb3f0562 job: @force parameter for job_cancel_sync()
Callers should be able to specify whether they want job_cancel_sync() to
force-cancel the job or not.

In fact, almost all invocations do not care about consistency of the
result and just want the job to terminate as soon as possible, so they
should pass force=true.  The replication block driver is the exception,
specifically the active commit job it runs.

As for job_cancel_sync_all(), all callers want it to force-cancel all
jobs, because that is the point of it: To cancel all remaining jobs as
quickly as possible (generally on process termination).  So make it
invoke job_cancel_sync() with force=true.

This changes some iotest outputs, because quitting qemu while a mirror
job is active will now lead to it being cancelled instead of completed,
which is what we want.  (Cancelling a READY mirror job with force=false
may take an indefinite amount of time, which we do not want when
quitting.  If users want consistent results, they must have all jobs be
done before they quit qemu.)

Buglink: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/462
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20211006151940.214590-6-hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
2021-10-07 10:42:09 +02:00
Max Reitz c2c731a4d3 test-blockjob: Test job_wait_unpaused()
Create a job that remains on STANDBY after a drained section, and see
that invoking job_wait_unpaused() will get it unstuck.

Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210409120422.144040-5-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2021-04-09 18:00:29 +02:00
Thomas Huth da668aa15b tests: Move unit tests into a separate directory
The main tests directory still looks very crowded, and it's not
clear which files are part of a unit tests and which belong to
a different test subsystem. Let's clean up the mess and move the
unit tests to a separate directory.

Message-Id: <20210310063314.1049838-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
2021-03-12 15:46:30 +01:00
Renamed from tests/test-blockjob.c (Browse further)